Consulting
DACH Market Entry & Regulatory Orientation
Entry routes, timelines, and requirements for Germany, Austria, and Switzerland: we put into context what BaFin, FMA, and FINMA mean for your model and run the preparation as a project — alongside the law firm you engage.
Schedule a ConsultationOur Services
Regulatory Landscape
DACH supervisionat a glance.
Four authorities, four frameworks, one team. What looks like a labyrinth to market entrants, we put in order for you.
Europe's Reference Regulator
KWG, ZAG, WpIG: German supervision sets the bar for substance and documentation depth. Pass here, and you pass everywhere.
Our Process
A Structured Approach to Your Market Entry
Discovery & Assessment
We build a complete picture of your business model, target markets, and regulatory starting position and name the requirements and risks that need to be clarified.
Strategy Development
We design a tailored regulatory and market entry strategy with clear milestones, timelines, and resource requirements.
Implementation
We work side by side with your team and your law firm: on the application documents, on building the compliance framework, and on preparing your conversations with the regulator.
Ongoing Advisory
We provide continuous regulatory monitoring and advisory so your team can plan for changes in time as your DACH operations scale.
Scenario Studies
How we wouldapproach it.
Three typical starting positions, played through from first analysis to operational result — so you can judge how we work before you talk to us.
Scenario 01 · Payments
US payments provider wants to enter Germany
Scenario 01 · Payments
US payments provider wants to enter GermanyA payments provider established in the US wants to serve German enterprise merchants. No EU entity, no EU passporting, first leads already waiting — but nothing may be signed without a licensing structure.
- Groundwork for the law firm: we describe the planned services so that the firm can classify which of them are payment services under PSD2/ZAG and which run licence-free. The target licence (payment vs. e-money institution) and the most sensible EU home state follow from its classification.
- Structural decision with a timeline: own licence (12–18+ months lead time) vs. launching via a licensed BaaS partner (months) — including cost model and exit path from the partner setup to the own licence.
- Supporting work on the application file in parallel to the partner launch: requirements profile for the managing directors (the search is run by an executive search firm), safeguarding concept, AML framework at AMLR level — alongside the law firm you engage.
- Commercial track from month one: anchor-client conversations under the partner structure, German-language sales materials, verification-of-payee and instant-payments capability as selling points.
- Handover: licence granted, customer migration onto the own structure, passporting notifications for Austria.
Scenario 02 · SaaS
UK RegTech SaaS selling to German banks
Scenario 02 · SaaS
UK RegTech SaaS selling to German banksA British RegTech vendor has a strong product and zero DACH presence. German banks show interest, but every procurement ends at the same question: is the vendor DORA-ready as an ICT service provider?
- Vendor-readiness audit against DORA: register-of-information capability, minimum contract content, exit support, sub-provider transparency — the gaps become a prioritised roadmap.
- Building the 'bank-ready package': incident notification processes with deadlines, EU data-residency options, and German-language documentation; audit-rights clauses and contract texts come from the vendor's law firm.
- Reference architecture for procurement: prepared answers to the institutions' standard questionnaires (outsourcing, concentration risk, testing).
- Sales build-up through our network: first conversations with business units instead of cold procurement outreach, pilot structure with tightly bounded scope.
- Scaling: the first pilot becomes the referenceable blueprint for the next institutions — including expansion to Austria.
Scenario 03 · Crypto
Asian crypto exchange seeking EU access
Scenario 03 · Crypto
Asian crypto exchange seeking EU accessA non-European crypto exchange has so far served EU customers in a grey zone via reverse solicitation. With MiCA, that route is effectively closed — what is needed is a CASP strategy that convinces both supervisors and banking partners.
- Service mapping as a working basis for the engaged law firm: we set the existing products against the MiCA catalogue; the firm assesses which of them are CASP services, which tokens fall under the stablecoin regime, and what must be discontinued before filing.
- Venue decision as a matrix: client gravity, supervisory signalling, talent market, group architecture — with an honest trade-off between speed and credibility.
- Substance building before filing: local management with a genuine mandate, custody architecture with documented key management, market-abuse surveillance, AML at AMLR level.
- Support in the application process alongside the engaged law firm: the file, white-paper processes, documents for the regulator’s follow-up questions, preparation of the managing directors’ interviews.
- In parallel: banking-partner soundings — because a CASP licence without account access remains theory.
Illustrative scenarios demonstrating our methodology — not client references and not promises of outcomes. Real projects vary with business model, authority, and market conditions.
Frequent Questions
The first questions,answered plainly.
Does Aegiron Capital Group replace a law firm?
How long does BaFin licensing realistically take?
Who is this service for?
Do you cover Austria and Switzerland too?
How does pricing work?
Which languages do you work in?
Ready to Navigate DACH Regulations?
Schedule a consultation to discuss your regulatory requirements and market entry strategy.
Schedule a ConsultationNote: Aegiron Capital Group Ltd does not provide legal advice and does not represent anyone before authorities or courts. You engage a licensed law firm of your choice directly for legal reviews and representation in proceedings; we coordinate our work with that firm.
